When establishing a brand new online service, companies can find several benefits when utilizing a number of aws backup and disaster recovery. As an experienced developer, I have used a number of these services and can recommend them to other people starting online services or dynamic websites.
Amazon Web Services (AWS) began in 2002, leveraging the infrastructure already in position by one of many internet’s largest e-tailers. AWS provides a range of web services which may form precisely what is now becoming popularly known as the “cloud”.
Currently on offer by AWS are approximately 20 web services for use inside the cloud. The most famous to date would be the Elastic Cloud Compute and Simple Storage Service, respectively known as EC2 an S3.
S3 – Perhaps the service which existing webmasters can benefit from the quickest, is Amazon’s Simple Storage Service (S3). S3 is an online file storage system with built-in high redundancy and infinite scalability. Amazon uses clusters of servers throughout the world to guarantee as much as 99.999999999% retention and 99.99% up-time to any data you upload to S3.
Any existing files (as much as 5GB in size per file) from the website can easily be migrated to S3, letting it be utilized as a Content Delivery Network (CDN). Amazon’s AWS infrastructure resides on very fast internet backbones, which means content will generally be served considerably faster than if it were served from cheap shared hosting accounts. For your relatively cheap price per GB of storage and data transfer, many website owners currently using web hosting with limited storage and bandwidth may see instant cost reductions by migrating to S3 for content delivery.
For large websites and internet based services which serve massive levels of data, the price performance of Amazon’s S3 can be quite high and in many cases a necessary tool when other services cannot store such huge amounts of information.
For a company considering establishing a web-based file sharing or content-heavy service such as a photo or video sharing site, Amazon S3 offers many benefits and a performance which may otherwise need a large initial cost outlay.
EC2 – Amazon’s Elastic Cloud Compute (EC2) is perfect for server hosting what S3 is made for file storage – infinitely scalable and cost effective. With EC2, you can setup your personal cluster of virtual servers running in Amazon’s cloud of servers. You might want to operate a single, low-power virtual server or perhaps a cluster of 1000s of high end virtual servers, and then any variation in the middle. Each server you manage is referred to as an “instance” and you may decide to use an instance for as low as one billable hour.
Having the ability to choose how long you utilize an instance, in addition to how powerful it is actually, allows start-up companies to test a new powerful web application with no need to provision costly hardware initially. This alleviates most of the risk often encountered with web start-ups who must calculate how much capacity they will likely need after the site becomes popular. Under-estimating capacity often means a disruption of service, over-estimating will make the service less profitable.
The EC2 platform is completely programmable, too, which suggests companies can build intelligent systems which will scale as capacity limits per instance are encountered. If the server load is high, for example, more instances can be abwfmk on and share the load in the system. Once the load decreases, unneeded instances may be powered down, keeping costs and efficiency steady.
Currently, there are numerous Windows and Linux Amazon Machine Instances (AMIs) readily available for users for a starting place when customizing their virtual servers. User-contributed AMIs are also offered, with purpose-built server configurations available.
Pairing EC2 & S3 – For brand new startups and existing web services looking to migrate, a combination of EC2 server hosting and S3 being a Content Delivery Network is surely an ideal solution. For those able to use both services, it comes with an additional benefit in that inter-network traffic involving the EC2 and S3 accounts will most likely be without any any bandwidth costs.